Skip to case study
Conceptual industry artwork: a premium burger meal, takeout and neighborhood ordering.
BurgerFiRestaurant

Make local relevance
repeatable.

A franchise-marketing operating model connecting centrally managed campaigns, local discovery, ordering promotions and location-level reporting.

Historical engagementExplore the engagement
Reported same-store sales growth
34%
Reported digital-ordering increase
127%
Locations described in original account
120+

The public account does not identify the location cohort, comparison period or sales-attribution method. The location count describes the source's footprint, not a newly verified current store count. No claim of zero franchisee effort or identical performance at every location is made here.

01 / The assignment
  • Location-based paid campaigns
  • Local search and business profiles
  • Digital-ordering promotions
  • Franchise performance reporting

Consistency did not require every location to say exactly the same thing. It required a system that could support local relevance without fragmenting the brand.

The BurgerFi account describes the familiar tension between a national brand and individual franchise locations. Each location needed local visibility and relevant promotions, while franchisees had differing time, skills and resources for marketing. A scattered approach could produce very different customer experiences under the same brand. The assignment centered execution rather than expecting every franchise operator to become a marketer. Geo-targeted paid campaigns, local business profiles, digital-ordering promotions and reporting formed the operating model. The commercial question was how to make local marketing manageable at a wider footprint.

02 / The work

Centralize the work. Keep the context local.

CampaignsLocalize the execution around a shared standard.

The source describes geographically targeted social and search campaigns with localized creative and offers. Budgets were considered against location performance. The intent was to give individual markets relevant execution while maintaining a centrally managed program, rather than requiring every franchisee to assemble a separate campaign operation.

DiscoveryTreat the local listing as a customer-facing surface.

Google Business Profiles, photographs, reviews, local content and citations formed the local-search work. These surfaces help a guest understand a specific location. They therefore belong alongside advertising, rather than being treated as a separate directory-maintenance task with no connection to the customer journey.

OrderingConnect promotions with location-level learning.

The account includes first-order promotions, loyalty offers and win-back activity for digital ordering. Franchise dashboards brought campaign and sales measures into view. A location-level perspective helped make the program understandable to the operators whose businesses experienced the results.

Inside the operating idea

The local operating brief.

Illustrative division of marketing responsibilities. It is not a BurgerFi franchise manual, store report or live campaign dashboard.

BurgerFiIllustrative reconstruction / not a live system
SharedBrand and campaign direction

A common campaign framework helps avoid each location reinventing the work. Shared execution can reduce the operating burden while retaining consistency in how the brand is presented.

LocalAudience, offer and place

Geographic relevance and location information make the program useful to a nearby guest. Centralization should not erase the details that make a particular restaurant the appropriate destination.

VisibleResults an operator can understand

Location reporting connects the program with the business receiving the demand. Paid-media measures, digital ordering and same-store sales answer different questions and should remain distinguishable.

03 / What changed

Do not confuse central control with generic execution.

The original story reports higher same-store sales and digital-ordering volume across a multi-location context. It describes centrally managed campaigns and improved visibility for franchise operators. Those reported outcomes should not be converted into a promise that every individual location achieved the same result.

The decision that mattered

The useful design combined common operating responsibility with local relevance. That is more specific than either a uniform national campaign or a collection of disconnected franchise efforts. The system supplied a repeatable way to serve individual markets.

The operational lesson is about distributing relevance without distributing all the work. A franchise system can make local execution more consistent when it has shared responsibility, appropriate localization and a reporting view that remains useful to the location.

Source and measurement context

The public account does not identify the location cohort, comparison period or sales-attribution method. The location count describes the source's footprint, not a newly verified current store count. No claim of zero franchisee effort or identical performance at every location is made here.

Scope and figures are drawn from RevOasis's original BurgerFi engagement account. The diagrams explain the work; they are not original client documents or evidence of current system performance. The artwork is a conceptual industry illustration, not a photograph of the client's products or facilities. Reported outcomes are not a forecast for another business.

Client perspectiveKarl Goodhew

“RevOasis built a local marketing system that actually works at franchise scale. Same-store sales growth has been incredible, and our franchisees love that they don't have to manage campaigns themselves. It just works.”

Karl GoodhewChief Marketing Officer, BurgerFi
Your next chapter

What does your business
need to make possible?

Talk through the work
Another engagementWingstop